Chemical Dispersants Used in Bioremediating Oil Spills - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 17 Words: 5065 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2017/09/11 Category Advertising Essay Did you like this example? UNIVERSITY OF PORT HARCOURT FACULTY OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF PURE AND INDUSTRIAL CHEMISTRY SEMINAR PRESENTATION ON CHEMICAL DISPERSANTS USED IN BIOREMEDIATING OIL SPILLS BY UPORO VICTOR BARIBEFE U2006/5581377 COURSE CODE: ICH 400. 2 COURSE TITTLE: UNDERGRADUATE SEMINAR COURSE LECTURER: MR. GODSON IWUOHA SEPTEMBER, 2010 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 1. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Chemical Dispersants Used in Bioremediating Oil Spills" essay for you Create order 1 Introduction .. 2 1. 2 Background on the chemical composition of dispersants . 3 CHAPTER 2 2. History of Dispersants 6 2. 2 Dispersants Reformulation 7 2. 3 Function of dispersants . 7 2. 4 Current Dispersants 8 CHAPTER 3 3. 1 Mechanism of dispersion 12 3. 2 Toxicity of dispersants 5 3. 3 Analysis of the pros and cons to using dispersants at oil spills 17 CHAPTER 4 4. 1 Recommendations for the use of dispersants . 20 4. 2 Suggestions for future analysis and research .. 20 4. 3 References 21 CHAPTER 1 1. 1 INTRODUCTION Over the past couple of years, the use of chemical dispersants has become an increasingly common method to combat oil spills in water bodies. Chemical dispersants are substances applied to spilled oil that disperse oil into the water column rather than leaving it floating on the surface in a slick. When used appropriately, chemical dispersants can be an effective method of response to an oil spill. Following dispersant application, wave energy will cause the oil slick to break up into smaller oil droplets that are rapidly diluted and subsequently biodegraded by micro-organisms occurring naturally in the marine environment. Dispersing spilled oil into the sea by the use of oil spill dispersants can be an environmentally acceptable method of oil spill response. A â€Å"net environmental benefit† will be achieved if the damage that might be caused to marine life by dispersed oil is less than the damage that would have been caused if the oil had come ashore or drifted near to particularly oil-sensitive resources. This justification for dispersant use cannot, however, be imported into every oil spill scenario. Dispersing spilled oil in some circumstances might have the potential to damage marine life that exists in the close vicinity of a dispersing oil slick. Dispersed oil droplets and the chemical components in oil that are transferred into the sea have the potential to exert toxic effects, but only if the oil is present at high enough concentration for prolonged periods. This will only occur if there is not sufficient dilution of the dispersed oil and oil components into the sea. This report amongst other things aims to give an overview of the effectiveness of these oil spill dispersants in bio-remediating oil spills, the types and generations of dispersants available, their toxicity and preference of one mode/type over the other(s). . 2 BACKGROUND ON THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF DISPERSANTS Dispersants are chemical formulations which reduce the surface tension of water allowing the oil to disperse into small droplets in the water column. The dispersants which are available on the market today comprise several components, the most important being a blend of two or three surfactants (surface active agents). Other components of dispersants include the solvent (the carrier of the surfactant) and additives. SURFACTANTS ( SURFACE ACTING AGENTS) The surfactant molecules are the key component of chemical dispersants. Surfactants bind to both oil and water to produce finely dispersed droplets of oil-surfactant molecules. The most common surfactants used are non-ionic (fatty acid esters and ethoxylated fatty acid esters) and anionic (sodium alkyl sulphosuccinate). Surfactants are made up of two parts: an oleophilic or rather lipophilic part (oil loving) and a hydrophilic part (water-loving). When dispersants are sprayed onto an oil slick, the solvent transports and distributes the surfactants through the oil slick to the oil/water interface where they re-arrange so that the oleophilic part of the molecule is in the oil and the hydrophilic part is in the water. This creates a sharp reduction in the surface tension of the oil/water interface and small oil droplets break away from the oil slick with the help of wave energy. Re-coalescence is minimised by the presence of the surfactant molecules on the droplet surface and the reduced probability of encountering other oil droplets as they move apart. There are several different basic chemistries of surfactants. An example of each class is as shown: (1. ) Ethoxylated fatty amines (Cationic) (2. ) Alkylphenol ethoxylate-based surfactants (non-ionic) These surfactants usually include an alcohol as a solvent (isopropanol (X-77 ®, AG-98â„ ¢), butanol (R-11 ®, AG-98â„ ¢ (N)), glycol (AG-98â„ ¢ (N), Activator 90)), a silicone defoamer (polydimethylsiloxane), and water. (3. ) Alcohol ethoxylate-based surfactants (non-ionic) (4. ) Sodium alkyl sulphosuccinate (anionic) (5. ) Silicone-Based Surfactants. Also known as organosilicones, these are increasing in popularity because of their superior spreading ability. This class contains a polysiloxane chain. Some of these are a blend of non-ionic surfactants (NIS) and silicone while others are entirely silicone. The combination of NIS and a silicone surfactant can increase absorption into a plant so that the time between application and rainfall can be shortened. Examples: Sylgard ® 309 , Dyne-Amic ®, Silwet L-77 ® , etc. Blends normally include an alcohol ethoxylate, a defoamer, and propylene glycol. SOLVENTS Solvents must be used because the surfactants are often viscous or solid, and are either hydrocarbon-based or water-based. Modern dispersants are a blend of surfactants in a solvent. The solvent has two functions: * It reduces the viscosity of the surfactants which enables it to be sprayed and, * It promotes the penetration of the surfactant into the oil slick. ADDITIVES Another important component, the additive stabilizes and prevents the oil particle from breaking away from the border area between the oil and the water. These additives are also referred to as stabilizing agents. CHAPTER 2 2. HISTORY OF DISPERSANT Before 1970, chemical dispersants were degreasing agents that were developed to clean tanker compartments and engine rooms. The TORRY CANYON spill off Cornwall, England in 1967 resulted in the use of 6,000 barrels of chemical used to treat a spill of 85,500 barrels of oil. Many of these chemicals were degreasing solvents and were more toxic than the oil itself. The denser surfactants did not evaporate, mix with, or dissolve in water. Instead, they formed a stable â€Å"oil-detergent† emulsion that had a negative synergistic effect causing more harm to the environment than had they done nothing. There was a significant impact to the marine and coastal environment with resulting massive kill off of fish and intertidal invertebrates. Over 10,000 tons of detergents were sprayed on the floating oil. The result of the negative media attention was a poor public image of chemical dispersants. Future dispersant usage saw increasingly better results. In 1979 the Ixtoc 1 spill released more than 3. 5 million barrels of oil. Almost 500 aerial missions were flown applying the dispersant COREXIT 9527 to 1,100 square miles of slick. While dispersants were not used in the US waters, there was successful application of dispersants seen. 2. 2 DISPERSANT REFORMULATION While dispersant application was becoming increasingly more successful, dispersants were being reformulated to address concerns for efficiency and toxicity. COREXIT products are the principle US dispersants. In 1967 EXXON produced COREXIT 7664. This weak-water based product was the first that was specifically formulated for the marine environment. This product was not used during the TORREY CANYON. In 1972 EXXON produced the first â€Å"selfmix† concentrate, COREXIT 9527. This was the first product that could be applied by aircraft. In 1992 EXXON developed COREXIT 9500, which was effective on heavy, weathered and emulsified oils. (Exxon-mobil, 2004) By the third generation of formulas, dispersants consisted of surfactant with little solvent. These were designed to be mixed with water. 2. 3 FUNCTION OF DISPERSANTS Dispersants reduce the interfacial tension between the oil and water and helps the creation of small oil droplets, which move into the water column facilitating quicker natural biological breakdown (biodegradation) and dispersion. By decreasing the size of the oil droplets, and dispersing the droplets in the water column, the oil surface area exposed to the water increases and natural breakdown of the oil is enhanced. Dispersants are used to minimise the environmental impact of an oil spill. Dispersants do not eliminate the problem of an oil spill but are intended as a means of reducing the overall environmental impact of an oil slick at sea. Dispersant use accelerates the weathering and biological breakdown of oil at sea and reduces the impact of oil on sensitive foreshore environments. Oil Spill Dispersants are also highly effective in reducing exposure of sea birds to oil as most sea birds are oiled by slicks on the surface of the sea or in near shore coastal habitats. Dispersed oil is less sticky than undispersed oil, therefore the adhesion and absorption onto surfaces and sediments of dispersed oil is greatly reduced compared with the original oil slick. 2. 4 CURRENT DISPERSANTS Over time, dispersants have developed over what one usually divides into three generations. The first generation of dispersants that came out on the market were hydrocarbon-based and were made of aromatic hydrocarbons, which gave rise to toxic effects. The second generation of dispersants that developed, the so-called ‘conventional dispersants’, contained no aromatic hydrocarbons and are used today in seas where they are applied directly from vessels without dilution. Conventional dispersants are starting to be replaced by the third generation of dispersants, the so-called ‘concentrated dispersants’ because these are easier to handle during clean-up operations. Concentrated dispersants are diluted with water before application, such that the volume problem on vessels and aircrafts decreases. Third generation dispersants are usually divided into two types based on their solvent agent – water-based or hydrocarbon-based. Hydrocarbon-based dispersants The solvent is a hydrocarbon with a low or no aromatic content. These dispersants typically contain between 15-25% surfactant and are intended for neat application to oil. They should not be pre-diluted with sea water since this renders them ineffective. They also require a high application rate of between 1:1 to 1:3 (dispersant to oil). Hydrocarbon-based dispersants are less effective and may be more toxic than concentrate dispersants and, as a consequence, in many countries are not now commonly in use. Concentrate or self-mix dispersants These dispersants contain a blend of different surfactants with both oxygenated and hydrocarbon solvents. They contain a higher concentration of surfactants (25% to 65%) and can be applied either undiluted (neat) or pre-diluted with sea water although it is more common to apply them undiluted. A typical dosage ranges between 1:5 to 1:30 (undiluted dispersant to oil). Water-based concentrated dispersants have a comparatively low toxicity, but require a longer time to disperse oil than ready-mixed products. Due to this time lag, there is a risk of using too much water-based dispersant before the process is complete. The hydrocarbon-based products have a higher toxicity than water-based products but require a lower dose with application. The manufacturers therefore claim that the toxicity levels of both types of products are low. A summary of dispersants used today is provided below (Table 1). Table 1. The table summarises the dispersants used today, application methods and dosages. Standard name| Generation| Type| Application method| Solvent| Dosage(dispersant/oil)| ConventionalDispersants| Second| 1| Not diluted on ships. | No aromatic hydrocarbons| 30-100%| Concentrated dispersants| Third| 2| Diluted on ships. | Water-based (e. g. glycol ether)| 5-15% (concentrated products)| | | 3| Not diluted on ships or airplanes. | Hydrocarbon based. | | The water-based dispersants’ solvent is made up of alcohol, glycols and glycol ethers (mostly ethanol, isopropane, ethylene glycol and propylene glycol) to increase its ability to mix with oil and lower the freezing point. Surfactants make up over 20% of these dispersants. The dispersant is applied from ships and diluted before application. Water-based dispersants require a relatively long time to complete dispersion. It has been argued that exceeding the dosage of these substances is common because people’s expectations for oil dispersion are too high. The most important limitation is their sensitivity for extreme temperatures. At high temperatures, there are security risks as certain solvents used in products are fire-hazardous. The most critical temperature area, though, is under 0 °C, because the risk for refreezing in the spreading device is high. The development of concentrated hydrocarbon-based dispersants, also known as self-mixing dispersants, has made the dispersion of oil on the sea surface much faster and easier. Self-mixing dispersants are spread from aircrafts, which means a doubling of the capacity. At present the following oil spill dispersants have been approved under the National Plan guidelines. Their Trade Names are listed below: * Tergo R-40 * Ardrox 6120 * BP-AB * Corexit 9500 * Corexit 9527 * Corexit 9550 * Shell VDC * Shell VDC+ * Slickgone NS * Slickgone LTSW. Composition of common dispersants Corexit 9527 The proprietary composition is not public, however the manufacturers own safety data sheet on Corexit EC9527A says the main components are 2-butoxyethanol and a proprietary organic sulfonate with a small concentration of propylene glycol. Corexit 9500 In response to public pressure, the EPA and Nalco released the list of the six ingredients in Corexit 9500, revealing constituents including sorbitan, butanedioic acid, and petroleum distillates. Corexit EC9500A is mainly comprised of hydrotreated light petroleum distillates, propylene glycol and a proprietary organic sulfonate. Environmentalists also pressured Nalco to reveal to the public what concentrations of each chemical are in the product; Nalco considers that information to be a trade secret, but has shared it with the EPA. Propylene glycol is a chemical commonly used as a solvent or moisturizer in pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, and is of relatively low toxicity. An organic sulfonate (or organic sulfonic acid salt) is a synthetic chemical detergent that acts as a surfactant to emulsify oil and allow its dispersion into water. The identity of the sulfonate used in both forms of Corexit was disclosed to the EPA in June 2010, as dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate. Often referred to as docusate sodium, this chemical is the active ingredient in several stool-softener laxatives. Sorbitan (3S)-2-(1,2-Dihydroxyethyl)tetrahydrofuran-3,4-diol| | Sorbitan is a mixture of chemical compounds derived from the dehydration of sorbitol. The mixture can vary, but usually consists of 1,4-anhydrosorbitol, 1,5-anhydrosorbitol and 1,4,3,6-dianhydrosorbitol. Sorbitan is primarily used in the production of surfactants such as polysorbates. Sorbitan esters ( also known as Spans ) are lipophilic non ionic surfactants that are used as emulsifying agents in the preparation of emulsions, creams, and ointments for pharmaceutical and cosmetic use. When used alone they produce stable water-in-oil emulsions but they are frequently used with a polysorbate in varying proportions to produce water-in-oil or oil-in-water emulsions or creams with a variety of different textures and consistencies. Sorbitan esters are also used as emulsifiers and stabilisers in food. Toxicity The relative toxicity of Corexit and other dispersants are difficult to determine due to a scarcity of scientific data. The manufacturers safety data sheet states No toxicity studies have been conducted on this product, and later concludes The potential human hazard is: Low. According to the manufacturers website, workers applying Corexit should wear breathing protection and work in a ventilated area. Compared with 12 other dispersants listed by the EPA, Corexit 9500 and 9527 are either similarly toxic or 10 to 20 times more toxic. In another preliminary EPA study of eight different dispersants, Corexit 9500 was found to be less toxic to some marine life than other dispersants and to break down within weeks, rather than settling to the bottom of the ocean or collecting in the water. None of the eight products tested are without toxicity, according to an EPA administrator, and the ecological effect of mixing the dispersants with oil is unknown, as is the toxicity of the breakdown products of the dispersant. Corexit 9527, considered by the EPA to be an acute health hazard, is stated by its manufacturer to be potentially harmful to red blood cells, the kidneys and the liver, and may irritate eyes and skin. The chemical 2-butoxyethanol, found in Corexit 9527, was identified as having caused lasting health problems in workers involved in the cleanup of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. According to the Alaska Community Action on Toxics, the use of Corexit during the Exxon Valdez oil spill caused people respiratory, nervous system, liver, kidney and blood disorders. Like 9527, 9500 can cause haemolysis (rupture of blood cells) and may also cause internal bleeding. According to the EPA, Corexit is more toxic than dispersants made by several competitors and less effective in handling southern Louisiana crude. On May 20, 2010, the EPA ordered BP to look for less toxic alternatives to Corexit, and later ordered BP to stop spraying dispersants, but BP responded that it thought that Corexit was the best alternative and continued to spray it. Reportedly Corexit may be toxic to marine life and helps keep spilled oil submerged. There is concern that the quantities used in the Gulf will create unprecedented underwater damage to organisms. Nalco spokesman Charlie Pajor said that oil mixed with Corexit is more toxic to marine life, but less toxic to life along the shore and animals at the surface because the dispersant allows the oil to stay submerged below the surface of the water. Corexit 9500 causes oil to form into small droplets in the water; fish may be harmed when they eat these droplets. According to its Material safety data sheet, Corexit may also bio accumulate, remaining in the flesh and building up over time. Thus predators who eat smaller fish with the toxin in their systems may end up with much higher levels in their flesh. Effectiveness The oil film will be dispersed in small droplets which intermix with the seawater. The oil is then not only distributed in two dimensions (on the surface) but is dispersed in three (in the water). In handling Louisiana crude Corexit EC9500A (formerly called Corexit 9500) was 54. 7% effective, while Corexit EC9527A was 63. 4% effective. The EPA lists 12 other types of dispersants as being more effective in dealing with oil in a way that is safe for wildlife. One of those tested was Dispersit, which was 100% effective in dispersing Gulf oil and is less toxic to silverfish and shrimp than Corexit. Alternatives UK authorities have an approved list of products which must pass both sea/beach and rocky shore laboratory toxicity tests, following a review of approval procedures over a decade ago. Corexit did not pass the rocky shore test when submitted for renewal of its inclusion on the list, and was dropped. Although it has been omitted from the approved list since 1998, existing stocks which pre-date the removal may be permitted for use away from rocky shorelines, subject to prior approval. SLICKGONE NS Dasic Slickgone NS is one of the best selling Type 3 concentrate dispersants on the world market and has frequently been shown to be the most effective dispersant available for a wide range of different oils including those with a high wax content. Slickgone NS is extremely low in toxicity to marine organisms and is approved by many international approval organisations. SLICKGONE EW Dasic Slickgone EW is the latest member of the product range. Slickgone EW combines high efficiency and low toxicity with an exceptional ability to breakdown chocolate mousses (water in oil emulsions). Slickgone EW will continue to disperse efficiently those oils which have become too weathered to be amenable to conventional dispersants, therefore extending the window of opportunity for dispersant use. Unlike most dispersants, Slickgone EW is also effective on refined oils and bunker fuels making it a truly versatile dispersant for the 21st century. SLICKGONE LTSW Dasic Slickgone LTSW is a water based, hydrocarbon free, concentrate dispersant. It is highly effective at emulsifying crude oils, fuel oils and water in oil emulsions. It has extremely low toxicity and is internationally approved. CHAPTER 3 3. 1 MECHANISM OF DISPERSION Following an oil spill, some of the oil will disperse naturally into the water column. The extent to which this occurs depends on the type of oil spilt and the mixing energy. Oils with a lower viscosity are more amenable to natural dispersion than the ones with a higher viscosity. Natural dispersion takes place when the mixing energy provided by the waves and wind is sufficient to overcome surface tension at the oil/water interface and break the oil slick into droplets of variable sizes. The chemical dispersion process. A: Dispersant droplets containing surfactants are sprayed on to the oil. B: The solvent carries the surfactant into the oil. C: The surfactant molecules migrate to the oil/water interface and reduce surface tension, allowing D: small oil droplets to break away from the slick. E: The droplets disperse by turbulent mixing, leaving only sheen on the water surface. Generally, larger oil droplets will rapidly resurface and then coalesce to form an oil slick, but the smaller droplets will remain suspended in the water column where they will be diluted by turbulence and subsurface currents. The process of natural dispersion takes place in moderately rough seas with breaking waves and winds above 10 knots (5 m/s). Chemical dispersants aid the natural dispersion of oil by reducing the oil/water interfacial tension and, along with the natural motion of the sea, allow the break up of oil on the water into very fine droplets. Effectiveness of oil dispersion by chemical dispersants at sea is governed by a range of conditions and include the: * type and chemistry of the oil, * degree of weathering of the oil, * the thickness of the oil slick, type of dispersant, * droplet size and application ratio, * prevailing sea conditions (wave mixing energy), and * sea temperature and salinity Oil Spill Dispersant effectiveness varies greatly with oil type spilt and the degree of weathering of the oil. For example with increasing wind speed and wave action, the loss of light oil components increases. Evaporation becomes more significant, causing an increase in viscosity and density of th e remaining oil, and forming emulsions with water. The oil slick becomes thicker and heavier. It is generally accepted that for oils over 2000 cSt (Centistockes a measurement of the mobility of oil) viscosity, the effectiveness of oil dispersants decreases significantly. An oil that was easily dispersed may change quickly by wind and wave action into an oil which is not dispersable. To achieve an efficient dispersion, oil droplet size must be in the range of 1 ? m to 70 ? m with the most stable size being less than 45 ? m. Smaller droplets are better as they remain suspended in the water column where they will be diluted rapidly in the top few metres of the sea to below harmful concentrations. The increased surface area provided by the small droplets also enhances the opportunity for biodegradation of the oil. It is important to remember that dispersants are manufactured primarily for use in the marine environment. Their efficiency will be optimum in waters with a salinity of around 30-35 parts per thousand (ppt) but will decrease rapidly in waters with a salinity below 5-10 ppt, especially when pre-diluted. Similarly, efficiency is also affected when salinity rises above 35 ppt. In freshwater, dispersant effectiveness is dramatically reduced because the surfactants tend to travel through the oil layer into the water column instead of stabilising at the oil/water interface. Nevertheless, some dispersants have been specially formulated for use in freshwater. In a confined freshwater system, other factors also need to be considered, such as whether there is sufficient water depth or exchange of water to achieve adequate dilution. 3. 2 TOXICITY OF DISPERSANTS Knowledge on the toxicity of dispersants comes largely from laboratory studies. Only in a few cases have systematic studies been carried out on the toxicity of dispersants at a spill. No common standard method for testing the effectiveness of dispersants has been developed yet, other than certain oil companies’ and institutes that have developed their own tests. This has made it difficult to compare different products on the market and has also resulted in wide variances in quality among products on the market. The need remains to develop a testing system that is accepted by all countries and is used for the approval of products based on the requirements of each country. se tests to measure the effectiveness of dispersants. Test results of approved first generation dispersants showed them to be highly poisonous on test organisms. Toxicity values around 1 mg/L (measured as 48 h LC50, the concentration that kills 50% of test organisms within 48 hours of exposure) were registered for many adult marine invertebrates. Examples of products that showed such valu es include BP 1002, Slickgone, Gamlen, Essolvene and Finasol SC. The most harmful component in dispersants is the solvent, with very high aromatic concentrations. Second generation dispersants showed lower toxicity values, often between 1 000 – 10 000 mg/L (48 h LC50) in adult organisms. Examples of such products include BP 1100X, some Corexits and Finasol OSR-2. (Lehtinen, 1981). The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has conducted toxicity tests on several of the dispersants they allow. Tables 4 through 7 summarise the toxicity of four different dispersants Corexit 9500, Corexit 9527, Dispersit 1000 and JD-109. The tests studied the toxicity of dispersants alone, dispersants with oil, and oil alone. The toxicity tests were carried out on the minnow Menidia beryllina (96-hours test) and the crustacean Mysidopsis bahia (48-hours). (EPA, 2001). In summary, the studies suggest that a mixture of oil and dispersant give rise to a more toxic effect on aquatic organisms than oil and dispersants do alone. Analyses of dispersants alone showed that Corexit 9500 and 9527 are the least harmful for aquatic organisms. Dispersit 1000 and JD-109 showed similar toxicity levels as the oil products. 3. 3 ANALYSIS OF THE PROS AND CONS TO USING DISPERSANTS AT OIL SPILLS An account of the pros and cons for the use of dispersants to combat oil spills n the sea is presented in Table 2. From an environmental point of view, the best method to control oil is naturally to remove the oil from the water using mechanical methods. When these methods do not work or there are other reasons for not using them, chemical dispersion of oil can be an alternative. If the decision is made to use dispersants instead of m echanical combat methods, one should keep in mind that chemically dispersed oil reduces the chances for later mechanical clean-up. Dispersants can only be used within a limited time period. The window for using dispersants at an oil spill is short. In addition, applying dispersants is only possible during daylight hours when one can still see the extent of the oil. In certain situations, using dispersants to combat oil spills in seas can be preferred as mechanical control actions are not always successful. Chemical dispersion prevents the oil from emulsifying. The advantage of chemical control is that it decreases the damage oil can cause on birds and marine mammals. In addition, the number of incidents where the oil slick affects beaches will also be reduced or prevented. In the case of an oil slick moving towards the coast, strategic use of dispersants can disperse the oil vertically towards deeper waters instead of it moving along the water surface towards shallower and more productive areas by the coast. If the oil is not sufficiently dispersed, there is even a risk that drops coagulate again and build a new film of oil. It is therefore important for the amount of mixing energy to be high for effective dispersion. Table 2. Pros and cons for the use of dispersants at oil spills. Pros| Cons| The oil does not remain on the water surface * Often the method that produces the fastest results * Compared to other methods, dispersants are more effective in weather conditions that create fast mixing of water * Easy to apply * Prevents the oil from emulsifying * Grinds up the oil making natural decomposition easier * Seabirds and marine mammals can be saved * Prevents oil contamination of beaches| * Builds an oil cloud underwater and can product harmful effec ts for aquatic organisms that would otherwise not have been affected by the oil * Not always effective on all oil types * Limited window of time for use (relatively short) * Application is only possible when the oil slick is visible * Must be used where water masses are large for effective dilution * Mixing of oil and dispersants can be more toxic than each part individually * Few studies looking at long-term effects in the field * If the oil is not sufficiently dispersed, drops can coagulate again * Oil drops can settle * During beach clean-up, dispersants can increase the penetration of oil into the sedimentation * Few field studies on the effects of bioaccumulation| CHAPTER 4 4. 1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE USE OF DISPERSANTS Based on the knowledge garnered on dispersants and their effects, one can recommend their use on Nigerian waters. This is based on the deciding factors for effective dispersion – water temperature, salinity, and amount of mixing energy. Before dispersants can be recommended at all, more studies need to be conducted looking at the spread and bioaccumulation of dispersants at sea and what effects they can give rise to. 4. 2 SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE ANALYSIS AND RESEARCHS Over the course of this research, gaps in current knowledge were identified. The main areas that need future research are the spread of dispersants and how dispersion products and dispersed oil bio-accumulate. The long-term effects of dispersants need to be studied. In order to adequately understand the effects of oil dispersants on aquatic systems, the following studies should be undertaken: †¢ Long-term effects of dispersed oils on aquatic organisms †¢ Bioaccumulation of dispersants and dispersed oil †¢ Is there a risk that dispersed oil may coagulate again? †¢ Analysis of the environmental effects of dispersants used on past oil spills †¢ Analysis of the use of sinkers, beach cleaning agents, etc. 4. 3 REFERENCES 1. Belore, Randy. â€Å"The History of Chemical Dispersants in the United States. † Petroleum Association of Japan Esymposium, 2004. 2. Bonn Agreement, 2001. Counter pollution manual: Chapter 20. Homepage 2001-02-26:https://www. bonnagreement. org 3. Chemicals Meant To Break Up BP Oil Spill Present New Environmental Concerns. ProPublica. https://www. propublica. org/article/bp-gulf-oil-spill-dispersants-0430. Retrieved 2010-05-07. 4. Considering Dispersant Planning Caps. U. S. Coast Guard, 1998. https://www. uscg. mil/vrp/reg/disperse2. shtml#potential Dispersants. 5. Danish EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 2001. National structure – Spill notification point and response authority for clean-up operation at sea. 6. Dispersant Pre-approval status throughout the U. S. U. S. Coast Guard, 2004. https://www. uscg. mil/vrp/reg/disperse. shtml 7. Elmgren, R. , Hansson, S. , Larsson, U. , Sundelin, U. och Boehm, P. D. 1983. The â€Å"Thesis† Oil Spill: Acute and Long-Term Impact on the Benthos†. Marine Biology 73, pp. 51-65. 8. Environment Canada, 2001. Oil spill dispersants. Environment Canada’s homepage 2001-05-14: https://www. atl. ec. gc. ca/epb/envfacts/oil 9. ExxonMobil, 2004 https://www. prod. exxonmobil. com/scitech/leaders/capabilities/ mn_downstream_safety_dispersants. html 10. Jamie Anderson (May 23, 2010). BP to persist with Corexit 9500 dispersant. themoneytimes. com. https://www. themoneytimes. com/featured/20100523/bp-persist-corexit-9500-dispersant-id-10114389. html. Retrieved June 26, 2010. 11. Juliet Eilperin (2010-05-20). Post Carbon: EPA demands less-toxic dispersant. Washington Post. https://views. washingtonpost. com/climate-change/post-carbon/2010/05/epa_demands_less_toxic_dispersant. html. Retrieved 2010-05-20. 12. Ministry for the Environment and Energy’s homepage 2001-05-09: https://www. mst. dk/ DeCola, Elise G. 1999. Dispersed Oil Toxicity Issues, A National Research Council. â€Å"Using Oil Spill Dispersants on the Sea. † 1989. 13. National Contingency Plan Overview. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Oil Program, 2004. https://www. epa. gov/oilspill/ncp 14. National Contingency Plan Product Schedule. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www. epa. gov/emergencies/content/ncp/product_schedule. htm. Retrieved 2010-05-21. 15. Paul Quinlan (2010-05-24). Secret Formulas, Data Shortages Fuel Arguments Over Dispersants Used for Gulf Spill. New

The Only Way Out in Richard Miller´s The Dark Night of the...

Richard E. Miller, the author of The Dark Night of the Soul, is an English professor/executive director of the Plan-genre Writing Center at Rutgers University. He studies the English curriculum in the U.S and questions if it is successful or a dying art. This is evident in The Dark night of the Soul, It can be quite a shock to confront the possibility that reading, writing, and talking exercise almost none of the powers we regularly attribute to them in our favorite stories. The dark night of the soul for literacy workers comes with the realization that training students to read, write, and talk in more critical and self- reflective ways cannot protect them from the violent changes our culture is undergoing. Miller through-out the essay†¦show more content†¦John. Miller though says that one can face their dark night of their soul by using the art of writing. â€Å"To write by virtue of their deep insights into the human spirit; that a world filled with artistic creations is superior to one filled with the cast offs of the consumer culture; that writing provides access to immortality.† Joining the Liars Club is a perfect example of someone using writing to face their past, their darkest part of their soul. â€Å"Writing, as she uses it, is a hermeneutic practice that involves witnessing the mundane horrors of the past in order to make peace with that past†, states Miller. The Dark night of one’s soul is a personal fear, past, journey that in the end you reach a sense of peace. The book A Child Called It by Dave Pelzer is an exquisite book. It is Mr. Pelzers’ way of dealing with the dark night of his soul. He tells his journey through extreme child abuse, and how he overcame his past and now uses it for good. When I was younger and going through a rough time I picked up this book and read it in one day, I was overwhelmed with the fact that someone made it out of all that ,this great man did and he still continued to have a positive attitude. Seeing that he could face his past, now as an adult I know I can face mine. As I read his story tears poured down my faceShow MoreRelatedWhat Are the Literate Arts Good for? Essay1229 Words   |  5 PagesWhat Are The Literate Arts Good For? Miller asked a question in his text, The Dark Night of the Soul, which is asked on numerous occasions. ‘What might the Literate Arts be good for?’ Miller gives situations and reasons why we could say the Literate Arts are useless in today’s world. What might the Literate Arts be good for? I ask this question a lot nowadays too. When I go for an English class or see literary books, the question creeps into my mind unconsciously. In this modern world ‘readingRead MoreJohn F. Kennedy Is Not The Only One Of The Best Presidents2421 Words   |  10 Pages John F. Kennedy is considered not the only one of the best Presidents in the history of our country, but one of the best leaders of his time. During his Presidency, he faced the life threatening issue of the Cold War, and had to not only run a country under complete utter stress, but counter many situations uniquely like the Bay of Pigs Invasion. But, he was also an excellent speaker, and during his inaugural address in January of 1963, he stated, â€Å"And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what yourRead More An Analysis of Hawthorne’s My Kinsman, Major Molineux Essay3946 Words   |  16 Pagesand over 21 (Mackey 64). With this increased participation in government, the common man was elevated to a new and higher plane. This inclusiveness widened the democratic community by including multiple voices and various perspectives, instead of only the select few of the aristocracy. At the fundamental level of all of these changes was a shift in the relationship between society and the individual. However, this also presented an interesting paradox in the developing democracy: the individualRead MoreGuilt as Reparation for Sin in Nathaniel Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter5500 Words   |  22 Pagesto oneamp;#8217;s wrongs. Reverend Mister Dimmesdale learns that secrecy only makes the guilt increase. Nathaniel Hawthorne is trying to display how guilt is the everlasting payment for sinful actions. The theme of guilt as reparation for sin in The Scarlet Letter is revealed through Nathaniel Hawthorneamp;#8217;s use of northeastern, colonial settings, various conflicts, and characters that must live with guilt for the sins they have committed. Nathaniel Hawthorneamp;#8217;s elaborately descriptiveRead MoreHomosexuality in Victorian and Elizabethan Literature.6608 Words   |  27 Pagesnovels. Bram Stoker told a story about a vampire that challenged the Victorian gender roles and managed to reverse them, making men faint like women, and making women powerful like men, and called it Dracula. Mary Shelley created a a physical being out of a mans suppressed homosexuality due to his Victorian male upbringing; a man named Frankenstein. Robert Stevenson described what happens when a homosexual male attempts to live double lives to cover up his true feelings, and entitled it The StrangeRead MoreLiterary Criticism : The Free Encyclopedia 7351 Words   |  30 Pagesnovel is sometimes used interchangeably with Bildungsroman, but its use is usually wider and less technical. The birth of the Bildungsroman is normally dated to the publication of Wilhelm Meister s Apprenticeship by Johann Wolfgang Goethe in 1795–96,[8] or, sometimes, to Christoph Martin Wieland s Geschichte des Agathon of 1767.[9] Although the Bildungsroman arose in Germany, it has had extensive influence first in Europe and later throughout the world. Thomas Carlyle translated Goethe’s novelRead Moredreams of vision9899 Words   |  40 PagesHIDAYATULLAH STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY JAKARTA 2009 APPROVEMENT ANALYSIS ON TRAGIC CHARACTER IN THE MAYOR OF CASTERBRIDGE A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Adab and Humanities In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Strata (S 1) By ANDRI HERMANSYAH 102026024515 Advisory: INAYATUL CHUSNA, M.Hum. 150331233 ENGLISH LETTERS DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF ADAB AND HUMANITIES SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY JAKARTA 2009 ABSTRACT Andri Hermansyah, AnalysisRead MoreConfucianism in Journey to the West31834 Words   |  128 Pagesand society started to renegotiate, reformulate and reconstruct the country’s national identity, which incorporated a revaluation of Confucianism and Chinese tradition.[20] Not only did academic interest in Confucian studies intensify[21], the political role and presence of Confucianism was restrengthened as well. Miller writes that since the open door policy, â€Å"selective usage of Confucianism and national sentiment are the methods the CCP appears to be using to foster a pragmatic nationalist sentimentRead MoreStrategy Safari by Mintzberg71628 Words   |  287 Pageshave as much relevance for managers and consultants in practice as students and professors in the clasroom. So we set out to write an easily accessible explanation of the fascinating field of strategic management. Sure, some parts may appeal more to practitioners, while others may be more of interest to the aca demically inclined. This is in the nature of the beast. We did not set out to domesticate it but to make it friendly. We wanted readers from everywhere to join our safari. But at the same timeRead MoreOrganisational Behavioure23151 Words   |  93 PagesROBBMC08.QXD.0132431521 12/15/05 12:25 PM Page 258 Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them. — David Hume Emotions and Moods After reading this chapter, you should be able to: 1 Differentiate emotions from moods. 5 2 Discuss the different aspects of emotions. Discuss the impact emotional labor has on employees. 6 Identify the sources of emotions and moods. Discuss

Hamlet Faith Essay Example For Students

Hamlet Faith Essay A great chain of events in Hamlet, Shakespeares great revengetragedy, leads to Hamlets own demise. His necessity for subterfuge allows him toinadvertently neglect is main objective, revenge. So much so that the ghost ofhis dead father appears to stipulate Hamlets reserved behavior towards hisfathers revenge. Do not forget. This visitation is to whet thy almostblunted purpose, (83-84) says the ghost in a motivational manner whichalmost suggests a lack of faith on Hamlets behalf. Nevertheless, Hamlet isoverflowing with faith. Faith in god, faith in himself, even faith in his deadfathers ghost a faith that will cost him his life. The untimelyDeath of King Hamlet, Hamlets father, has sparked a disturbance inthe regularity of Denmark. Hamlets mother has waited Not so much, nottwo (12) months after the Kings death to remarry and her new husband, whocoincidentally is King Hamlets brother, has swiftly embraced the throne. As theplot unfolds, King Hamlets ghost appears to young Hamlet. He exp lains thecurrent dilemma and elicits a vengeful feeling from Hamlet, providing youngHamlet with purpose, to Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder. (25) At first, Hamlet is weary of this appearance, but he compromises histhoughts and put his faith in the ghost. In addition, the ghost even evokes avow of allegiance from Hamlet. However, at this juncture in time, Hamlet findshimself in a state of disbelief. And shall I couple hell? (26)speaks Hamlet once the ghost has departed, suggesting that Hamlet is verydoubtful. However, his doubts are subsequently invalidated at the performance ofThe Murde! r of Gonzago where he requests a group of players to enact asimilar murder to that of King Hamlets. Ill have these players playsomething like the murder of my father before mine uncle. The plays the thingwherein Ill catch the conscience of the King. (55) Towards the end of theplay, Claudius hastily removes himself from the crowd, verifying Hamletssuspicions. Now, Hamlet not only possesses every reason to believe the ghost,but entrusts his faith in the ghost as well. However, Hamlets faith does not liesolely in the ghost. He has another ki nd of faith faith in himself. Hamletsbelief that he can see through his revenge blatantly exemplifies his faith inhimself. In several instances, Hamlet requires himself to act mad To putan Antic disposition on (30) if you will. His real life performance is soconvincing, that it arises concern in several characters such as Claudius,Gertrude (Hamlets mother), and Polonius. Regardless of whether or not theseindividuals involve themselves for their own purposes this dramatizationperformed by Hamlet requires the highest degree of faith. Hamlet himselfprofesses That ever he was born to set it right (30) referring tohis very existence as a device, a device which will Set it rightconclusively demonstrating his faith in himself. Moving forward, in a subsequentscene to Claudiuss dramatic exit, Hamlet is offered an opportunity to exact hisrevenge upon Claudius, who is seeking atonement for his misdeeds. In one foolishmoment, Hamlet spares his uncles life. His belief is that if Claudius were to die during confession, Claudiuss spirit would ascend to heaven and Hamlet willnot accept this. Hamlet figures he will wait until He is drunk asleep, orin his rage, or in thincestuous pleasure of his bed, at game a-swearing, orabout some act that has no relish of salvation int, then trip him. (80)Hamlets obvious plan is to wait until Claudius sins, and then avenge his father. .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b , .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b .postImageUrl , .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b , .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b:hover , .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b:visited , .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b:active { border:0!important; } .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b:active , .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u7cd1c9966137e77a54e2c26093d6778b:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Huck Finn8 EssayThis move cost Hamlet his life. Hamlets previous decision was based upon hisbelief in divine purposes. Since he was avenging his father for a decent, moralpurpose god will be on his side. Hamlet himself speaks, My words fly up,my thoughts remain below. Words without thoughts never to heaven go, (80)indirectly suggesting that words or actions, combined with thought, will findtheir way to heaven. Hamlets evocations point towards a belief in divinity. Thisbelief leads to the death of Polonius, and furthermore to the death of Hamlet. In the next scene, Hamlets fate is sealed. Polonius, the Wretched, rash,intruding fool, (81) was up to his old tricks, while Hamlet accidentallyslays Polonius mistaking Polonius for Claudius. Later on, Laertes returns toavenge his father. How came he dead? (99) asked Laertes. Upon hisdiscovery of Hamlets actions, Laertes becomes embodied with grief. Claudiusquickly takes advantage of this by manipulating Laertes to duel Hamlet. Laertes,under the influence of Claudius takes his fury one step further and poisons hissword, a poison so lethal that one cut will end Hamlet. During their duel,Laertes wounds Hamlet then In scuffing, they exchange swords. Hamletwounds Laertes and they are both poisoned. In the remaining moments, Hamletlearns of the Poison, The point envenomed too! Then, venom, to thywork. (134) exclaims Hamlet as he strikes Claudius down, and they allparish. Hamlet gets his revenge. But to do so, he must sacrifice the lives ofGertrude, Polonius, Laertes and himself. He conseq uently entrusted hisFaith into both the right place, and the wrong place because gotwhat he wanted, however died during the process. Hamlet displays his faith inhimself when he was willing to sacrifice his own life to avenge his father. Heproves this by proclaiming his understanding, and compassionate feelings towardsLaertes plight, For by the image of my cause I see the portraiture ofhis, (124) Hamlet says, suggesting he understood that he was destined todie. We furthermore see that Hamlet does not lose faith in his fathers ghost. The ghosts second visit demonstrates this when he inspires Hamlet to finallyfinish what he has started. And as for faith in divinity, Hamlet himself remarksthat a divine power controls our purposes when he says, Theres a divinitythat shapes our ends (121)Shakespeare

Changing identity free essay sample

Everyone in this room has an identity. But it’s not something that we were born with. Throughout our lives our identities have changed and developed as we experienced new things. Writer Parker J Palmer sees identity as when our past experiences of people and places come together to form who we are at this moment. From this we can draw that identity is a product of our external environment and is strongly influenced by the people places we are constantly exposed to. This concept of identity is explored in the elegiac poem ‘The Death of the Bird’ by A. D Hope and ‘The Window’- a short story by Pham Thi Hoai. Our identities are always subject to change as it is strongly linked to our ever- changing surroundings. This concept of identity is reinforced in The Death of the Bird by A. D Hope through the shift in the mood of the poem. The poet’s diction as he depicts the migrating journey of the bird as it travels through the ‘warm passage to the cooling station’ and is ‘sure and safely guided by ‘love’ emphasises the bird’s strong emotional ties to the place where it belongs creating safe and comfortable mood. However, as the poem progresses the bird gets ‘uncertain of her place’ and is portrayed as a ‘vanishing speck in those inane dominions creating the strong visual imagery of a tiny, delicate bird juxtaposed to the harsh condition of its unfamiliar environment emphasising the bird’s vulnerability. The contrast created by this dramatic shift in mood exemplifies how identity is a result of the place you connect to but is susceptible to change once that connection is lost. Similarly in The Window, the unstable nature of identity is evident through the narrator’s changing self-identity. Much like the Bird, the narrator in The Window has a strong connection to the place where she belongs. She is always looking out her ‘magic ever-changing window, rotating like a Rubik cube’. Through the comparison of her environment to a Rubik cube- a puzzle that can only be solved through the constant change of its state- Hoai is stating that the narrator’s environment is also in a constant state of change. This unstable nature of her environment reflects on the narrator’s own identity. Towards the end of the story when a man appears close to the window the narrator longs to ‘caress a man closely hugged to my chest, breathing in the smell of the opposite sex’. The sensory image created through the stimulation of the touch and smell senses evokes romantic feeling proving that the narrator is in fact a romantic or at least longs for a romance of some kind. This contrasts her previous statement that she is ‘violently allergic to any notion of romanticism’. The constant exposure to her changing environment has caused this shift in the narrator’s identity. Your identity is formed through your identification with significant people and places in your life. This idea of identity is explored by Hope throughout The Death of the Bird as for the bird ‘being home, memory becomes a passion with which she feed her brood and straws her nest’. The motherly imagery of the Bird suggests that her identification to her home is as strong as a mother’s love portraying the bird passionate character. This sense of characterisation which occurred as result of her emotional ties to her place shows how the bird’s environment has shaped her identity. On the contrary, The Death of the Bird shows that identity cannot fully form when it is unable to identify with significant others as she is ‘Alone in the bright host of her companions’. This oxymoronic line highlights the bird’s incapability to connect with others beyond a physical realm. This results in the loss of her connection to the land as ‘the invisible thread is broken as she flies’ eventually shifting her identity forever when ‘the great earth receives the tiny burden of her death’. Through the eventual loss of the bird’s identity we can see that people need a strong connection with both their place and people in order for their identities to fully develop and thrive. The Window also reflects this concept of identity. The window in the story serves as microcosm of the narrator’s surroundings, becoming everything she interacts with. Pham This Hoai illustrates the narrator’s meticulous examination of people and ‘their identity, their occupation, age, blood type appearances, whether they are gross or slender, good citizens or outlaws’ through a discounting list to reflect that even though all these things are part of what people see, they are not important aspects of their identity and ‘none of this is important to her [me]’ as they are all embodied in what one can see. Instead the author shows a deeper interest in their capacity to love which is not always apparent. However, through the lack of dialogue and personal relations the narrator has it is evident that, much like the bird, she struggles to connect to the people that surround her. This also lead to her ultimate down fall as is suggested by the change in tense at the very end of the story, ‘Apart from a crumpled cigarette he was also holding a bicycle pump†¦ This afternoon he is bound to come again. ’ The melancholic mood is created through signifying that the narrator continues to wait at the window and maybe for eternity suggests that she will never be able to have the connection she so longs to have. Ultimately from the close analysis of the two texts it is evident that identity is a product of our external environment and is strongly influenced by the people places we are constantly exposed to. Both The Death of the Bird and The Window show that identity is strongly influenced by our environment and is thus always inclined to change. They also show that our identities need strong connections to both place and people in order to fully develop.