The Language of Reality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 8000 words

The speech communication of Reality - Es order ExampleBeyond elementary semantic structures numerous sub-layers of meaning and communication hold out to both enrich and complicate the way in which we interact and express our ideas and emotions. It is not what we say, but how we say it. The ground of artificial intelligence and its struggle to embrace the complexities of e realday communication shows just how interdependent language, international cultural foces and the personal realm of experience can be. A simple de-coding or patterning of linguistic structures as we understand them is barely enough to compose the bare bones of the seemingly simple ways in which we communicate. The gap between tendency and reception can create a crossfire of miscommunication - where meaning be copes alienated from cast and the most intangible aspects of speech are cast into the spotlight. In the theoretical space between intention and reception - where communication can either prosper or becom e fragment - lie determinants such(prenominal) as perception and recognition. We therefore largely depend upon these two elements to formulate successful interactions, and to form the model of what we perceive as reality - in the sense that we depend upon information to guide, instruct, elucidate and define the human beings around us. Sayre (1965, p. 177), examines the distinction between perception and recognition - and the roles they play in our understanding and interpretation of the world around us According to the theory outlined in Plato Meno and Phaedo, acquisition of knowledge is a return of recollection or recognition. As someone comes to know that about which he has been ignorant, he cognizes again .... If I have never seen, been told about, read about or in some other way come to know about gooseberries, then upon seeing a gooseberry for the first succession I simply could be said to recognize it. The next time I see a gooseberry I probably will recognize it, if n ot by name then at least as an quarry of the sort I had seen some time previously. But if the first time one perceives an object is the first time one has ever been cognitively aware of such an object, perforce at that time one does not recognize it. It is commonplace, on the other hand, that we perceive objects which we have never perceived before, nor larn about in any other way. In this understanding of recognition and perception, the act of recognition is,by definition, rooted in the realm of memory and past experience. Memory, it isgenerally accepted, tends towards subjectivity, embellishment and is oftenpowerfully influenced by the emotions or mindset that were in force at thetime when the incident occured. It follows that recognition is unreliable as an objective conduit for accuratelyconveying intend meaning - as it will always be influenced by a recipientsinternalised framework of understanding. In this way, the eventual meaningconveyed by a piece of information is outs ide of the control of the speakeror communicator from the moment the idea leaves their immediate sphere andenters a communication occupation - whether that channel be through the mediumof speech, or through a technological pathway such as the internet. Once a piece of information is liberated from the person in possession ofits intended meaning - it immediately falls prey to the co-authorship of socialcontext and recipient subjectivity. Caught in a fragmented point of juncturebetween initial source, external influences and final perception and recognition- a heart is defined and understood by a melange of often contradictory realities1 which - by way of their very merger and interconnectedness -